Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 09:25

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Tulsa, Oklahoma, plans more than $105m in reparations for America's 'hidden' massacre - BBC
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Free agent LB Germaine Pratt agrees to terms with Raiders - NBC Sports
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why did my ex-narcissist move so fast with his new supply marriage engagement moving in, etc.?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Harvard gastroenterologist shares 4 bloat-busting tricks that actually work - Times of India
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Rockets To Sign Jabari Smith Jr. To Five-Year Extension - Hoops Rumors
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Dallas researchers find cancer’s secret weapon to defeat death - Dallas News